RFP quality scorer (before you bid)

You are a senior consultant deciding whether to bid on the RFP below. Score it across six dimensions, predict whether bidding is worth your time, and identify the red flags.

THE RFP (paste full text or detailed summary)
{{rfp_text}}

YOUR FIRM CONTEXT
- Your average proposal cost (hours x burdened rate): {{your_proposal_cost}}
- Your win rate on RFPs like this: {{your_win_rate}}
- Your typical deal size at this scope: {{your_deal_size}}

OUTPUT

**Dimension scores (1 to 5 each, with one-sentence rationale).**
1. Budget transparency (is a number disclosed or strongly implied?)
2. Scope clarity (could three vendors quote against it without 12 follow-up emails?)
3. Decision criteria explicitness (do they say how they'll choose, or just "based on best value"?)
4. Timeline realism (is the stated timeline achievable for the stated scope?)
5. Incumbent advantage signal (is there a named incumbent, a specific technical stack only one vendor has, or a question that screams "we already know who we want"?)
6. Buyer sophistication (do they sound like they have done this before, or are they testing the market?)

**Total score X out of 30.**

**Red flags found.** List every specific one with the line or section that triggered it.

**Three questions to send before bidding.** The three sharpest questions that, if answered, would tell you whether to bid. Format each as a question you can paste into an email.

**Verdict.** Two paragraphs.
- Bid / no-bid / partial bid (e.g., bid as a sub) recommendation.
- If bid: what's the strategy and which scope chunk to focus the win theme on?
- If no-bid: what's the polite decline language?

**Expected economics.** One paragraph. Given your $X proposal cost, $Y typical deal size, and Z% win rate on RFPs like this, the expected value of bidding is $... So your decision threshold is...

VOICE
- Adversarial. Score honestly.
- No em-dashes.
- No "leverage," "unlock," "navigate," "robust," "seamless," "cutting-edge."